Emma Goldman Archive
Written: 1914
Source: Published by Richard G. Badger, The Gorham Press, in Boston, and in Toronto, the Copp Clark Co., Ltd., 1914.
Transcription/Markup: Andy Carloff
Online Source: RevoltLib.com; 2021
The social and revolutionary significance of Henrik Ibsen is brought out with even greater force in "Ghosts" than in his preceding works.
Not only does this pioneer of modern dramatic art undermine in "Ghosts" the Social Lie and the paralyzing effect of Duty, but the uselessness and evil of Sacrifice, the dreary Lack of Joy and of Purpose in Work are brought to light as most pernicious and destructive elements in life.
Mrs. Alving, having made what her family called a most admirable match, discovers shortly after her marriage that her husband is a drunkard and a roué. In her despair she flees to her young friend, the divinity student Manders. But he, preparing to save souls, even though they be encased in rotten bodies, sends Mrs. Alving back to her husband and her duties toward her home.
Helen Alving is young and immature. Besides, she loves young Manders; his command is law to her. She returns home, and for twenty-five years suffers all the misery and torture of the damned. That she survives is due mainly to her passionate love for the child born of that horrible relationship--her boy Oswald, her all in life. He must be saved at any cost. To do that, she had sacrificed her great yearning for him and sent him away from the poisonous atmosphere of her home.
And now he has returned, fine and free, much to the disgust of
Pastor Manders, whose limited vision cannot conceive that
out in the large world free men and women can live a decent and
creative life.
Manders. But how is it possible that a--a young man or young woman with any decent principles can endure to live in that way?--in the eyes of all the world!
Oswald. What are they to do? A poor young artist--a poor girl. It costs a lot of money to get married. What are they to do?
Manders. What are they to do? Let me tell you, Mr. Alving, what they ought to do. They ought to exercise self-restraint from the first; that's what they ought to do.
Oswald. Such talk as that won't go far with warmblooded young people, over head and ears in love.
Mrs. Alving. No, it wouldn't go far.
Manders. How can the authorities tolerate such things? Allow it to go on in the light of day? (To Mrs. Alving.) Had I not cause to be deeply concerned about your son? In circles where open immorality prevails, and has even a sort of prestige----!
Oswald. Let me tell you, sir, that I have been a constant Sunday-guest in one or two such irregular homes----
Manders. On Sunday of all days!
Oswald. Isn't that the day to enjoy one's self? Well, never have I heard an offensive word, and still less have I ever witnessed anything that could be called immoral. No; do you know when and where I have found immorality in artistic circles?
Manders. No! Thank heaven, I don't!
Oswald. Well, then, allow me to inform you. I have met with it when one or other of our pattern husbands and fathers has come to Paris to have a look around on his own account, and has done the artists the honor of visiting their humble haunts. They knew what was what. These gentlemen could tell us all about places and things we had never dreamed of.
Manders. What? Do you mean to say that respectable men from home here would----?
Oswald. Have you never heard these respectable men, when they got home again, talking about the way in which immorality was running rampant abroad?
Manders. Yes, of course.
Mrs. Alving. I have, too.
Oswald. Well, you may take their word for
it. They know what they are talking about! Oh! that that great,
free, glorious life out there should be defiled in such a way!
Pastor Manders is outraged, and when Oswald leaves,
he delivers himself of a tirade against Mrs. Alving for
her "irresponsible proclivities to shirk her duty."
Manders. It is only the spirit of rebellion
that craves for happiness in this life. What right have we human
beings to happiness? No, we have to do our duty! And your duty
was to hold firmly to the man you had once chosen and to whom
you were bound by a holy tie. . . . It was your duty to bear with
humility the cross which a Higher Power had, for your own good,
laid upon you. But instead of that you rebelliously cast away
the cross. . . . I was but a poor instrument in a Higher Hand.
And what a blessing has it not been to you all the days of your
life, that I got you to resume the yoke of duty and obedience!
The price Mrs. Alving had to pay for her yoke, her duty
and obedience, staggers even Dr. Manders, when she reveals
to him the martyrdom she had endured those long years.
Mrs. Alving. You have now spoken out, Pastor Manders; and to-morrow you are to speak publicly in memory of my husband. I shall not speak to-morrow. But now I will speak out a little to you, as you have spoken to me. . . . I want you to know that after nineteen years of marriage my husband remained as dissolute in his desires as he was when you married us. After Oswald's birth, I thought Alving seemed to be a little better. But it did not last long. And then I had to struggle twice as hard, fighting for life or death, so that nobody should know what sort of a man my child's father was. I had my little son to bear it for. But when the last insult was added; when my own servant-maid----Then I swore to myself: This shall come to an end. And so I took the upper hand in the house--the whole control over him and over everything else. For now I had a weapon against him, you see; he dared not oppose me. It was then that Oswald was sent from home. He was in his seventh year, and was beginning to observe and ask questions, as children do. That I could not bear. I thought the child must get poisoned by merely breathing the air in this polluted home. That was why I placed him out. And now you can see, too, why he was never allowed to set foot inside his home so long as his father lived. No one knows what it has cost me. . . . From the day after to-morrow it shall be for me as though he who is dead had never lived in this house. No one shall be here but my boy and his mother. (From within the dining-room comes the noise of a chair overturned, and at the same moment is heard:)
Regina (sharply, but whispering). Oswald! take care! are you mad? let me go!
Mrs. Alving (starts in terror). Ah! (She stares wildly toward the half-opened door. Oswald is heard coughing and humming inside.)
Manders (excited). What in the world is the matter? What is it, Mrs. Alving?
Mrs. Alving (hoarsely). Ghosts! the couple
from the conservatory has risen again!
Ghosts, indeed! Mrs. Alving sees this but too clearly
when she discovers that though she did not want Oswald
to inherit a single penny from the purchase money Captain Alving
had paid for her, all her sacrifice did not save Oswald
from the poisoned heritage of his father. She learns soon enough
that her beloved boy had inherited a terrible disease from his
father, as a result of which he will never again be able to work.
She also finds out that, for all her freedom, she has remained
in the clutches of Ghosts, and that she has fostered in Oswald's
mind an ideal of his father, the more terrible because of
her own loathing for the man. Too late she realizes her fatal
mistake:
Mrs. Alving. I ought never to have concealed
the facts of Alving's life. But . . . in my superstitious awe
for Duty and Decency I lied to my boy, year after year. Oh! what
a coward, what a coward I have been! . . . Ghosts! When I heard
Regina and Oswald in there, it was as though I saw the Ghosts
before me. But I almost think we are all of us Ghosts, Pastor
Manders. It is not only what we have inherited from our father
and mother that "walks" in us. It is all sorts of dead
ideas, and lifeless old beliefs, and so forth. They have no vitality,
but they cling to us all the same, and we can't get rid of them.
. . . There must be Ghosts all the country over, as thick as the
sand of the sea. And then we are, one and all, so pitifully afraid
of the light. . . . When you forced me under the yoke you called
Duty and Obligation; when you praised as right and proper what
my whole soul rebelled against, as something loathsome. It was
then that I began to look into the seams of your doctrine. I only
wished to pick at a single knot; but when I had got that undone,
the whole thing raveled out. And then I understood that it was
all machine-sewn. . . . It was a crime against us both.
Indeed, a crime on which the sacred institution is built, and for which thousands of innocent children must pay with their happiness and life, while their mothers continue to the very end without ever learning how hideously criminal their life is.
Not so Mrs. Alving who, though at a terrible price, works
herself out to the truth; aye, even to the height of understanding
the dissolute life of the father of her child, who had lived in
cramped provincial surroundings, and could find no purpose in
life, no outlet for his exuberance. It is through her child, through
Oswald, that all this becomes illumed to her.
Oswald. Ah, the joy of life, mother; that's a thing you don't know much about in these parts. I have never felt it here. . . . And then, too, the joy of work. At bottom, it's the same thing. But that too you know nothing about. . . . Here people are brought up to believe that work is a curse and a punishment for sin, and that life is something miserable, something we want to be done with, the sooner the better. . . . Have you noticed that everything I have painted has turned upon the joy of life? always, always upon the joy of life?--light and sunshine and glorious air, and faces radiant with happiness? That is why I am afraid of remaining at home with you.
Mrs. Alving. Oswald, you spoke of the joy of life; and at that word a new light burst for me over my life and all it has contained. . . . You ought to have known your father when he was a young lieutenant. He was brimming over with the joy of life! . . . He had no object in life, but only an official position. He had no work into which he could throw himself heart and soul; he had only business. He had not a single comrade that knew what the joy of life meant--only loafers and boon companions---- . . . So that happened which was sure to happen. . . . Oswald, my dear boy; has it shaken you very much?
Oswald. Of course it came upon me as a great surprise, but, after all, it can't matter much to me.
Mrs. Alving. Can't matter! That your father was so infinitely miserable!
Oswald. Of course I can pity him as I would anybody else; but----
Mrs. Alving. Nothing more? Your own father!
Oswald. Oh, there! "Father," "father"! I never knew anything of father. I don't remember anything about him except--that he once made me sick.
Mrs. Alving. That's a terrible way to speak! Should not a son love his father, all the same?
Oswald. When a son has nothing to thank his father for? has never known him? Do you really cling to the old superstition?--you who are so enlightened in other ways?
Mrs. Alving. Is that only a superstition?
In truth, a superstition--one that is kept like the sword of
Damocles over the child who does not ask to be given life, and
is yet tied with a thousand chains to those who bring him into
a cheerless, joyless, and wretched world.
The voice of Henrik Ibsen in "Ghosts" sounds like the trumpets before the walls of Jericho. Into the remotest nooks and corners reaches his voice, with its thundering indictment of our moral cancers, our social poisons, our hideous crimes against unborn and born victims. Verily a more revolutionary condemnation has never been uttered in dramatic form before or since the great Henrik Ibsen.
We need, therefore, not be surprised at the vile abuse and denunciation heaped upon Ibsen's head by the Church, the State, and other moral eunuchs. But the spirit of Henrik Ibsen could not be daunted. It asserted itself with even greater defiance in "An Enemy of Society,"--a powerful arraignment of the political and economic Lie,--Ibsen's own confession of faith.